Exploratory Paper On Political Ideology History Essay

Exploratory Paper On Political Ideology muniment EssayPolitical ideology is defined as a strike out of ideals and principles created for social order. Thus, after much consideration and deliberation, I chose to work on Political Ideology.Politics appeals to me because I have been intrigued by how it can tickle pink the masses with powerful rhetorics by charismatic personalities. President Barack Obama is a policy-making leader whom I greatly admire for his oratory eloquence displayed during his initiative rescuees in the U.S. Presidential Elections 2008. I was captivated by his Yes We Can speech which moves the crowd to disperse all doubts about their future and believing that the States will succeed under his lead.Marxism-Leninism and Maoism are communism by temper but takes on a different trope to cater to the pile in their respective countries, Russia and mainland get upa.Marxism-Leninism is a political ideology that is base on Valdimir Lenins writing on the ideas of K arl Marx. Marxism advocates fabianism while being heavily hypercritical on capitalism which he believes is the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, which centre a connection run by the upper echelons of society to their own benefit. His idea of socialism is that the society will be run by the working(a) phratry known as the dictatorship of the proletariat. Marxs ideas were heavily influenced by the class scramble in society.One monumental event that epitomises Marxism-Leninism ideology would be the 1917 October variety in Petrograd, currently known as St. Petersburg. Valdimir Lenin was the leader of the Bolshevik ( communist) society that summitpled the Russian Provisional government and created a new form of Russia called Soviet Russia which borrowed Marxism ideologies along with it.The Bolshevik won over the support of the majority of the workers and soldiers because of the repressive and autocratic ruling by the imperialist Tsar which resulted in declining frugal and soci al conditions. The working class was unhappy with long working hours, overcrowded trapping problems with poor sanitary control, low wages which was made worst by increases in cost of living due to Russias involvement in dry land War one at that time. Thus Lenin-led Bolshevik appealed to the masses and go about little resistance when they staged a coup, occupying government buildings and strategic points.In China, Maoism is a political ideology that straddles along the Marxism-Leninist line. Peasants and farming forms the fundamental and building blocks of a socialist society. The loss between Lenins Russia and Maos China is dictatorship of the working class while another is the dictatorship of the peasants.Mao Zedong rise to the top of the Chinese Communist Party was nothing short of spectacular. He was a founding member of the Chinese Communist Party in 1921 and was actively involved in spreading Marxist ideas to the peasants in his hometown of Hunan Province. The most signifi cant event in the history of communist China is The Long marchland in 1934-1935. During the Zunyi conference, Zhou Enlai was ousted as the Chief Political Officer of the society while Mao Zedong was elected Chairman of the Politburo with backings from the military leaders and he has never relinquished his position since.Mao Zedong was credited for unifying China as a Peoples Republic and away from imperialism (Qing Dynasty) and feudalism (War-Lords). Also, the Long treat gave the Chinese Communist Party the reputation that they are willing to wear hardship for the people and to formulate policies on land reform that would quash the plight of Chinese peasants thus gaining wide support from the peasants.Another difference from Marxism-Leninism is the deep belief that man can prevail in unpleasant conditions and achieved things through strong willpower. He personally pushed through this ideology during the wide Leap Forward (1958-1960) and the Cultural Revolution (1968-1976). Mao ism ideologies can also be found in Peru and Nepal.Locally, Singapore also had brushes with communist in the past. The Barisan Socialis was a former left-wing political party formed in 1961 by former members of the PAP (Peoples Action Party) and led by Dr Lee Siew Choh and Lim Chin Siong. The party was accused by the PAP to be a communist front and deemed a threat to national security which resulted in many Barisan Socialis members arrested and imprisoned without trial during operation coldstore by the internal security department.Singapore, widely regarded as a democratic society, would be understandably not be tolerant of the Barisan Socialis, supposedly advocates of communism since that would be conflict of political ideologies. However, based on an extract below, I felt that it could be reasons of a aider nature.In a recently declassified Colonial office papers, mightiness Philip Moore, who was Deputy High Commissioner of Britain in Singapore from 1963 to 1965, was quoted as sayingHe (Lee) went on to suggest that in order to avoid the Communists taking over, he would create a situation in which the UK Commissioner would be force to hang up the Constitution. This might be done either by the Singapore giving medication inviting a Russian trade mission to Singapore thus forcing a constitutional crisis, or by instigating riots and disorder, requiring the discussion of British troops. I did however, form the impression that he was quite certain he would lose a general election and was seriously toying with the thought of forcing British intervention in order to prevent his political enemies from forming a government. (CO 1030/1149 p.95, para 3)In history, after revolutions for a change in political ideology, there would be power struggle for leadership as can be seen in the Chinese Communist Party. Mao Zedong wiped out all that threatens his position as leader and started the Cultural Revolution. In the Soviet Union, after Lenins death, Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky fought for power to lead. In the end, Stalin ordered the assassination of Trotsky.The lesson to be learned from history is that power struggles for leadership happens before, during and after a revolution. Leaders clinging to power would use all means to consolidate their status by eliminating political rivals. It is no difference disregardless of political ideologies.